The Council of Ministers has allocated 6 million euros from the budget of the National Assembly so that parliament can pay the compensation due to a company associated with Nikolay and Evgeniya Banevi. The obligation arises following a final court decision in a case filed by "Helio-tour-s" AD against the National Assembly and the former Privatization Agency, now the Public Enterprises and Control Agency (PAPC).
The proceedings under the State Responsibility Act began in 2022 and concluded with a final decision by the Supreme Court of Cassation in February of this year. The supreme judges upheld the conclusions of the appellate instances, which in turn upheld the decision of the Sofia City Court.
The total amount that the National Assembly must pay amounts to 2,452,201 euros, with accrued statutory interest for the period from 16.05.2013 to 31.08.2026 reaching 3,522,155 euros. "The accrual of statutory interest on the obligation with each passing day leads to an urgent need for the National Assembly to secure and pay the due compensation," the government press office stated.
"Helio-tour-s" AD filed a claim against the parliament and the Privatization Agency amounting to 9,592,180 BGN, with the sum including significant interest. Separately, the PAPC must pay 327,190 BGN plus the respective interest.
The case is related to a long-standing legal provision that contradicts European Union law. This concerns a text from the Privatization and Post-Privatization Control Act, repealed only in 2015, which allowed the state, through the Privatization Agency, to impose a statutory mortgage on the property of privatized companies in the event of non-fulfillment of obligations under privatization contracts.
The claim was filed against the National Assembly and the Bulgarian body for state property management after the company lost coastal real estate. Mortgages were registered on them to secure the obligations of another company – "Helio". The Sofia City Court adhered to the established practice of the Supreme Court, according to which a third party cannot be held liable for another's debts without explicit consent.
The properties were subsequently sold by a private enforcement agent through foreclosure at significantly undervalued prices. One property has an area of 63,194 sq. m and is located in Chernomorets, "Akladi Heiri" locality. The other has an area of 1,583 sq. m and is located in Sozopol, "Likovunya" locality.
The property in Sozopol was sold for 77,777 BGN, and the one in Chernomorets for 1.7 million BGN, even though its market value at that time exceeded 9 million BGN, as established by a triple judicial expert report.
The court accepted that the National Assembly and the PAPC committed a sufficiently serious breach of European Union law, which caused property damage to "Helio-tour-s" AD. The reason is that the parliament did not timely repeal the disputed provision after Bulgaria's accession to the EU, and it continued to be applied by the state agency.
You may also like
Government updates 2026 budget: Shipka renovation and new priorities
PP refers 2026 Budget to the Constitutional Court: "The Presidency is a press office"
The Constitutional Court examines the legality of the 2026 budget
PP against a public procurement contract worth 103,000 euros: Are MPs spending on coffee and nuts?
"The damage to the owner, who is illegally deprived of their property and has lost their right of ownership, is commensurate with the market value of this property at the time of the loss," the court's motives state.
Коментари (11)
maria64@eu
07.08.2026, 10:02Ебати! Пак някой нещо отаранил... Трябва да има начин да се
Луд_Граждан
07.08.2026, 10:04абе хора, как е възможно изобщо?! шест милиона евро! това са пари на хората, деба! и пак някой си е мислил, че може да се облагодетелства за сметка на бюджета и на всички нас! да му шибат тия закони, които не работят.
Vasil26
07.08.2026, 10:04Мария, напълно съм съгласен с теб - наистина е потресаващо какви истории излизат! Шест милиона евро са доста пари, които можеха да послужат за нещо по-полезно за хората в България. Но какво да се прави, явно имаме нужда от по-строги закони и контрол, за да не се случват подобни ситуации.
7BD5CD47
07.08.2026, 10:05Абе, Мария, ама наистина ли?! Шест милиона за незаконни ипотеки? Да не
BAC3F068
07.08.2026, 10:07абе, мария, точно каза! и пак пари от бюджета отиват на вятъра! не може така все - някой краде, губи дела и държавата плаща... явно
snjlt350
07.08.2026, 10:42наистина ли е това единственото решение – да плащаме за чуждите грешки? шест милиона евро… не може ли да се намери някакъв механизъм, който
Дико
07.08.2026, 10:48Абе, писна ми! Шест милиана евро?! За какво, бе хора? Да плащаме за някакви си незаконни ипотеки? Това вече е пародия! Парите са на народа, а те ги раздават ей така, на вятъра. Ама наистина ли няма кой да понесе отговорност тези, дето са докарали държавата дотук?!
CD98C0D3
07.08.2026, 10:50я да питам - тия пари нема ли да ги имахме
dark_king202
07.08.2026, 10:50Абе, Дико прав си напълно! Шест милииона... честно казано, направо скандално. Ама какво да правим, нали знаете как е - законите са си закони, а ние плащаме сметката. Важното е сега да се види кой ги е докарал нещата до тук и да си понесе отговорността! Иначе пак ще сме ний народа платежоспособни, а те... те си гледат банките. Трябва
Прав_Реалист
07.08.2026, 11:18Ебати! Шест милиона евро?! За кво, питам ви аз? Да плащаме за някакви си ипотеки, които са били незаконни? Аман от тия далавери, бе хора! Все пак ще ни изцедят до крак
Димир
07.08.2026, 11:19Ебати! Шест милииона за ипотеки?! Ама хайде сега, бе! някой си е гледал кесията, а ний трябва да плащаме разни гнусотии. Да му шибат тия