According to a "Wired" investigation, "Meta" has secretly worked with "Rank One Computing" – a Denver-based facial recognition firm that supplies technology to the "Pentagon" – to create a prototype of facial recognition technology for its "smart glasses." The board of directors of Rank One includes a "former deputy director of the CIA" and a "former head of the FBI's science department," which highlights the company's deep ties to security structures.
A Pentagon partner behind the lens
According to "Wired," the collaboration focused on creating prototypes of "facial recognition" features for Meta's internal use, intended for its smart glasses. This partnership shows that Meta is deepening its ambitions in the field of "biometric capabilities" for wearable devices – despite repeated public assurances that the company "will not add facial recognition to consumer products without robust privacy protections."
The company "Rank One Computing" is listed on "Nasdaq" under the ticker "ROC" after raising "$24 million" in an initial public offering in "February 2026." It positions itself as the "only provider of multimodal biometric solutions produced 100% in America." Its algorithms have been evaluated by the U.S. "National Institute of Standards and Technology," and its clients include "law enforcement," "border control," and "fintech" sector entities.
The building blocks were already implemented
The revelations about Rank One's role follow a separate "Wired" investigation published on "June 4," according to which Meta had already embedded unreleased "facial recognition code" – internally called "NameTag" – into its companion app "Meta AI." The code was added in several updates throughout the year.
The "NameTag" feature was designed to "identify people" captured by the glasses' camera and to "notify the owner" when a person was recognized. Security experts confirm that the code was present and active in the app, although it was not accessible to end users.
Following a wave of public backlash, Meta removed this code in a "June 5" app update, deleting "face detection models," "biometric databases," and "'person recognized' notification triggers." A Meta representative described previous reports as "sensationalist" and insisted that "nothing reached consumers and no final decision had been made."
Human rights organizations sound the alarm
The revelations have intensified criticism from civil rights organizations. In April, over "75 organizations," led by the "ACLU," sent a letter to Meta CEO "Mark Zuckerberg" warning that equipping "Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses" with a facial recognition feature is a "line that society should not cross."
The "Electronic Privacy Information Center" ("EPIC") separately urged the "Federal Trade Commission" to block such a feature. According to activists, the combination of wearable devices with cameras and facial recognition creates a serious risk of mass real-time surveillance and violation of privacy rights in public spaces.
You may also like
Meta under pressure: the hidden "NameTag" and shadows over privacy in smart glasses
Half-a-million-euro scheme dismantled: Doctors defrauded national health and social insurance funds with fake check-ups
The "Baba Alino" scandal: The state has launched an inspection at Varna Municipality due to illegal construction
A white dwarf 'devouring' a companion star reveals the source of mysterious radio signals
Meta's official position remains that the company is only "exploring" this technology. However, the partnership with a supplier working for the "defense and intelligence community," combined with the fact that "facial recognition code had already been implemented" in millions of devices, suggests that Meta's research has gone much further than its carefully worded public statements. This raises new questions about transparency, accountability, and the boundary between innovation and mass surveillance.
Коментари (7)
user602@eu
16.06.2026, 13:21Еееееееееее! Пичове, вижте го т'ва! Meta пак майсторят нещо... ама сега и с Пентагона ли? 🤯
Динов
16.06.2026, 13:23абе, кво става бе?! сериозно ли готвят такива неща?! ТЕЗИ от meta все едно са безконтролни... ама да не би пък някой руснак да ги финансира тайно? четох за тия дето си играят с данни и харесвания, а сега и с пентагона ли ще се занимават? ясно е, че технологията напредва, ама тва вече почва да мирише на шпионски машинарии. европа трябва да има по-
Болов
16.06.2026, 13:25Абе, сериозно?! Тази работа с разпознаването на лица е малко стряскаща, особено когато става дума за такива компании и връзки с
mega_angel
16.06.2026, 13:26абе, вие се шавате за американците, а забравихте ли кой ни тормози от години? да гледаме си нашите проблеми първо, че като почнем да
Мислав
16.06.2026, 13:42Пак ли тия ат Метa?! Пълни шизофреници, кво правят
Бомир
16.06.2026, 13:46Абе, Мислав, прав си за Метa... ама то тея са като Pandora's box, веднъж отвориш – край. Това с Пентагона наистина е яко притеснително. Не казвам, че всяка технология е зле, напротив - имаме нужда от иновации, ама все пак трябва да си зададем въпроса: докъде сме готови да отидем
oduj751
16.06.2026, 13:46Абе, Мислав прав си, верно е, да са луди тия от Метa... но кво да се прави, технологията върви напред, нали? Ама тва с Пентагона вече ма навежда на мисли… Да не би да готвят някаква нова шпионска играчка за американците. Ние тук си търпим всякакви, ама пак казвам, кво правят?! Трябва да се внимава откъде чер