The Ukrainian government took an unprecedented step at the end of June, initiating an official procedure to leave the Ottawa Convention, which previously prohibited the production and use of anti-personnel mines. This move is seen as a critically important military action in the context of the current military conflict with the Russian Federation.
Leading international news agencies, including Reuters, analyze the motives behind this decision. The main reason lies in the need to effectively slow down the advance of Russian troops by strengthening defensive positions along the front line.
Military experts emphasize the serious challenges facing the Ukrainian army – limited supplies of artillery systems and ammunition from the US, which further motivates the search for alternative defensive strategies. The use of anti-personnel mines is viewed as a potential strategic advantage.
Ukrainian servicemen directly comment on the situation, pointing out that the Russian side does not adhere to international conventions. "If we mine our territory, we will have a chance to hold it," says a soldier named Alexei, who has undergone treatment after a mine incident.
Independent analysts confirm the massive use of prohibited ammunition by the Russian side. According to expert estimates, about 25% of Ukrainian territory is already mined or contains unexploded ordnance, which further complicates the military situation.
Military strategist Nikolai Beleskov from the National Institute for Strategic Studies explains that mine systems are extremely effective against new Russian tactics, including small assault groups with motorcycles.
On June 29, People's Deputy Roman Kostenko officially announced leaving the convention. His colleague, Fyodor Venislavsky, adds that Ukrainian manufacturers are ready to resume the production of anti-personnel means.
The decision raises serious questions about the future of international humanitarian law during armed conflicts.