Stanford University found itself at the epicenter of a serious scandal involving discriminatory practices against Jewish and Israeli students. An internal investigation revealed systemic violations in two student housing complexes, which forced the administration to take exceptional administrative measures.
The official investigation found that students were forcibly removed from activities solely because of their Jewish identity. Specifically affected were two cooperative housing complexes - "Enchanted Broccoli Forest" (EBF) and "Kairos", which are owned by the university but managed by students.
As a result of the revelations, the administration decided to take unprecedented actions. For the 2025-2026 academic year, these two housing complexes will be placed under direct control of the university administration. Their current names will be removed, and management will be carried out directly by the institution.
A key moment in the investigation was the discovery of an email sent by EBF leaders containing discriminatory messages towards white men. The document claims that the space is not intended for them and that their presence could be "suffocating".
University authorities unequivocally condemned such formulations, defining them as a direct violation of federal legislation and internal equality policy. An official statement emphasized that all housing spaces must be open and accessible to all students, regardless of their background.
This case fits into a broader context of tension in American universities, where issues of discrimination and identity are becoming increasingly sensitive. Stanford, known for its progressive traditions, now must prove its commitment to real equality.
Cooperative housing on campus has always been a symbol of student autonomy and alternative community practices. EBF, for example, positioned itself as a space for empowering marginalized groups, while Kairos focused on art and solidarity.
The university clearly stated that it is committed to maintaining a diverse and inclusive community, but only if all activities are accessible and non-discriminatory. The future restoration of the status of these housing complexes will depend on their ability to prove full compliance with equality principles.
The case gains even more significance against the backdrop of growing tension between the federal government and higher education institutions in the US regarding non-discrimination and access policies.
The ultimate goal of the actions taken is to ensure that Stanford remains an institution that respects differences and provides a safe academic environment for all of its students.